When Tim Keller was a young pastor working in his first
church, a single-mother with four children began attending the services. It soon became clear that she had severe
financial difficulties, and a number of people suggested that the church should
do something to help. So the deacons
were assigned to visit her, and the church gave her money to help her pay
outstanding bills. However, three months
later, it emerged that instead of paying off her bills with the church money, she
had spent it on sweets and junk food, had gone to restaurants with her family
multiple times, and had brought each child a new bike. Not a single bill had been paid, and she
needed more money. Understandably people
were perplexed. One deacon furiously
exclaimed, ‘no way do we give her any more.
This is the reason that’s she’s poor—she’s irresponsible, driven by her
impulses! That was God’s money and she
wasted it.’
This evening I want to suggest that we must not neglect the
poor, even those we think that they are undeserving. For our attitude towards the poor reflects
our understanding about the character of God and his gospel.
1. Compassion for the poor reflects the character
of GodIt should thrill our heart to see that God champions the cause of the poor. Our God is merciful and gracious. ‘The Lord is good to all; he has compassion on all he has made’ (Psalm 145:9). We should champion things like fair trade because his word tells us that he wants, justice to ‘roll on like a river, righteousness like a never-failing stream’ (Amos 5:24). ‘Whoever oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker, but whoever is kind to the needy honours God’ (Proverbs 14:31). He is even generous towards those who despise him, sending the sun and rain on both the righteous and unrighteous (Matthew 5:45). The cross reminds us of God’s desire for justice, for our God does not turn a blind eye towards our evil, but satisfies his demands of justice, being both just and the justifies those who have faith in Jesus (Romans 3:26).
In the Old Testament God shows a special concern for the
poor, the widow, the fatherless and the migrant. ‘Do not oppress the widow or the fatherless,
the foreigner or the poor’ (Zech. 7:10).
These four groups are highlighted because they were the most vulnerable
people of that day. Who would we put on
the list of most vulnerable in our society?
‘Do not oppress the homeless, the mentally-ill, the single-parent or
those in direct provision.’
2. Compassion
is to be modelled on God’s kindness to us
I heard of a Christian leader who believed that the cross,
as a symbol, was bad public-relations for the church. But our message is Christ crucified, and
Christ crucified isn’t just about having our sins forgiven, it’s to shape
everything.
This logic is seen in the Old Testament, where God’s
commands to care for the vulnerable are often spoken in terms of the great
rescue event of the Exodus. ‘Do not
deprive the foreigner or the fatherless of justice, or take the cloak of the
widow as a pledge. Remember that you
were slaves in Egypt and the Lord your God redeemed you from there.’
(Deuteronomy 24:17-18). They are to be
generous because God has been generous to them.
He has shown them kindness is rescuing them from slavery.
Of course the Exodus looked forward to a greater rescue—through
the death of Jesus, God has rescued us from slavery to sin and condemnation
even while we were his enemies. You
should show grace, because God has demonstrated grace to you. You should be kind, because God has been kind
to you. You should care about the
enslaved, because God has rescued from slavery to sin, condemnation and death.
Tim Keller writes that ‘there is a direct relationship
between a person’s grasp and experience of God’s grace, and his or her heart
for justice and the poor’ and that, ‘when the Spirit enables us to understand
what Christ has done for us, the result is a life poured out in deeds of
justice and compassion for the poor.’
3. The Cross
demonstrated compassion to the undeserving
In 1700s America, Jonathan Edwards was known for his gospel
preaching. He was famous for his sermon,
‘Sinners in the hands of an angry God.’
Yet he saw that the gospel he preached must impact our attitude towards
those less fortunate than himself.
However, when he encouraged his people to care for the poor, many came
to him with objections. So he wrote a
sermon entitled, ‘The Duty of Care to the Poor.’ It dealt with eleven objections that people
gave towards giving charity.
One objection Edwards dealt with was when people declare
that the poor person ‘deserves not that people should be kind to him. He is of
a very ill temper, of an ungrateful spirit’ and, in particular, he has treated
us badly.
We might say, ‘the problem with the homeless is their
addictions.’ We might say, ‘the problem
with the unemployed is that they have not tried hard enough.’ Not only do such comments reveal that we
don’t understand the complexity of homelessness and unemployment, they reveal a
lack of understanding of the gospel.
Gospel-centred people know that God didn’t wait until we deserved before
he came to our help.
Edwards wrote, ‘Christ loved us, was kind to us, and was
willing to relieve us, though we were very evil and hateful, of an evil
disposition, not deserving any good, but deserving only to be hated, and
treated with indignation; so we should be willing to be kind to those who are
of an ill disposition, and are very undeserving. Christ loved us, and laid
himself out to relieve us, though we were his enemies, and had treated him ill. So we, as we would love one another as Christ
hath loved us, should relieve those who are our enemies, hate us, have an ill
spirit toward us, and have treated us ill.’
4. The cross
demonstrates sacrificial love
When people said that they had nothing to spare, Edwards
suggested that what many meant is that they could not afford to give without it
actually being a burden to them. So he
emphasised the beauty of sacrificial love.
Think of Jesus’ parable of the Good Samaritan. The Samaritan is moved with ‘compassion’ (the
Greek word translated ‘compassion’ is only used in the gospels of Jesus or
people in his stories who reflect his attitude). It costs the Samaritan to care, as he uses
all his available resources (oil, cloth, time, energy and money) to help. The Samaritan is exposed to personal risk by
putting the injured man on his donkey (the road from Jerusalem to Jericho was
notorious for bandits and having a man on your donkey slowed you down and made
you more vulnerable to ambush). Bible
writer, Ken Bailey, points out that a Samaritan arriving into a village with a
wounded Jew on his donkey was open to dangerous misunderstanding (like an
Indian arriving into Dodge City with an injured cowboy draped over his horse,
he might be considered to be the main suspect to the man’s injuries). He then gives the innkeeper two denarii
(which would have covered food and lodging for at least a week), and then
commits himself to return to settle any outstanding bills. This is sacrificial love towards someone he
never met before.
Such sacrificial loving is demonstrated perfectly by
Jesus. Jesus who, being in very nature
God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own
advantage; rather, he made himself nothing by taking the very nature of a
servant, being made in human likeness. And
being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to
death–even death on a cross (Phil. 2:6-8).
‘For you know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ; that though he was
rich, yet for your sake he became poor, so that you through his poverty might
become rich’ (2 Corinthians 8:9).
But where do we draw the boundaries between ourselves and
others? In a world of need what luxuries
can I justify? How much time to I give
to my lonely neighbour?
One of the beauties of the gospel is that it doesn’t present
us with a list of rules which would either take the joy out of service or limit
us to obligation. Many people would like
to be told what percentage of their time and income they should give to the vulnerable. But if we were given such a rule we would be
prone to obeying the letter of the law, and not think about what we do with
what money and time remains. Jesus wants
all of our time and money to be under his loving rule. He doesn’t give us a law but graciously
instructs that we ‘should give what you have decided in your heart to give, not
reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver’ (2 Corinthians
9:7). The only way you are going to know
how to give well is by having a heart that is being shaped by the Holy Spirit.
What about burn out and the need for rest? He is our gentle Saviour who knows our
needs. A bruised reed he will not break
and a smouldering reed he will not snuff out (Matthew 12:20). Take advice from trusted friends who are
courageous enough to challenge you, but caring enough to see when you need to
slow down.
Conclusion
Tim Keller writes, ‘we tend to try to develop a social
conscience in Christians the same way the world does—through guilt. This doesn’t work, because we have a built in
defence mechanisms against such appeals … however, when justice for the poor is
not connected to guilt but to the gospel, this “pushes a button” down deep in
the believers’ souls, and they begin to wake up.’
The gospel reflects the beautiful character of the God who
cares for the vulnerable; a God who sent his Son for underserving, spiritually
bankrupt people; and a God who inspires us to sacrificial service. But he wants us to live this sacrificial
life, not so much because he needs our time and money, but because he desires
that we would experience the joy of being instruments in the redeemer’s
hands. For sacrificial service should
have an element of delight in it, as we realise that it is more blessed to give
than receive.
So, how did the church that Tim Keller led deal with the
woman who spent the money given to her on meals out and treats for the
kids? Keller made the point that if they
gave no more money to the family the children would suffer because of the poor
choice of the mother. As time went by it
became clearer to the deacons that the reason that she had squandered the
church’s money on restaurants and new bikes was that she felt terribly guilty
for the poor life she was giving her kids.
She wanted the children to feel like they were a part of a normal family
for once. As the deacons truly engaged
with her their hearts began to become more sympathetic. Nevertheless, they insisted that she pay off
the most pressing bills and formulate a plan to get better skills and a better
job. They also realised that all of her
problems were not financial and sought ways to support her in raising her
children. She agreed to work with the
deacons and over time the family’s life began to improve.
Do you know how to win in Monopoly? When I play monopoly I want the car—because a
car seems more real than an iron or a thimble.
Then I buy everything—because later on in the game someone will want
that piece of property, and pay me far more than I spent on it. And, if you want to win at Monopoly, show no
mercy—even when the lip on the ten-year-old you are playing begins to
quiver. Show no mercy, call in all your
debts and then, when you have won, go down to the corner-shop with all you
Monopoly money and treat yourself.
Of course, the man in the shop is going to look at you and
remind you that the game is over. That
Monopoly money is only paper, once the board has been put away.
One day this life’s game will also be over. We will then realise that so much of what we
put our energy into in this life is as worthless as Monopoly money. But the cross-shaped generosity that we have
shown in this life will have a significance that will pass with us into all
eternity, and be a cause of eternal celebration.
No comments:
Post a Comment