Showing posts with label Marriage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marriage. Show all posts

Monday, 16 July 2012

Touch me

The fifth, and last, love language that Chapman mentions is physical touch.  This is the second most important language to me.  Interestingly it is Caroline's least important love language.

Quotes:
'Try new touches in new places and let your spouse give you feedback on whether he finds it pleasurable or not.  Remember, he has the final word.  You are learning to speak his language.'
'Running the hand through the hair, giving a back rub, holding hands, embracing, sexual intercourse - all these and other "love touches" are the emotional lifeline of the person for whom physical touch is the primary love language.'

Thursday, 12 July 2012

Keller quotes on marriage

'When I married my wife, I had hardly a smidgen of sense for what I was getting into with her.  How could I know how much she would change over 25 years?  How could I know how much I would change?  My wife has lived with at least five different men since we were wed - and each of the five has been me.'  Lewis Smedes.
   
'When you first fall in love, you think you know the person, but you don't really.  You can't know who the person is right away.  That takes years.  You actually love your idea of the person - and that is always, at first, one dimensional and somewhat mistaken.'  Tim Keller


'When over the years someone has seen you at your worst, and knows you with all your strengths and flaws, yet commits him- or herself to you wholly, it is a consummate experience.  To be loved but not known is comforting but superficial.  To be known and not loved is our greatest fear.  But to be fully known and truly loved is, well, a lot like being loved by God.'  Tim Keller.

Keller points out that longitudinal studies reveal that two-thirds or unhappy marriages will become happy within five years if people stay married and do not get divorced.
'One of the most basic skills in marriage is the ability to tell the straight, unvarnished truth about what your spouse has done - and then, completely, unself-righteously, and joyously express forgiveness without a shred of superiority, without making the person feel small.  This does not mean you cannot express anger.  In fact, if you never express anger, your truth-telling probably won't sink in.  But forgiving grace must always be present, and if it is, it will, like salt in meat, keep your anger from going bad ...'
'... if your definition of "love" stresses affectionate feelings more than unselfish actions, you will cripple your ability to maintain and grow strong love relationships.  On the other hand, if you stress the action of love over the feeling, you enhance and establish the feeling.  that is one of the secrets of living life, as well as of marriage.'

'A lack of "sexual compatibility" might not be a lack of love making skill at all.  It may be a sign of deeper problems in the relationship.  It is often the case that, if those problems are addressed, the sexual intimacy improves.'

Monday, 9 July 2012

Further thoughts on love languages

So the five love languages are words of affirmation, quality time, receiving gifts, acts of service and physical touch.  What is your primary love language?  More importantly, if you are married, what is the love language of your spouse?  If you can find that out you could make them very happy!  I want to finish my thoughts on Chapman's book with some of the observations he makes in the closing chapters.
He points out that the male desire to have sex does not necessarily mean that physical touch is his primary love language.  For example, do we enjoy non-sexual touch?  If not then physical touch is not actually our primary love language.
'Most sexual problems in marriage have little to do with physical technique and everything to do with meeting emotional needs.'
Finally, Chapman suggests three ways to help find your love language: 1) Ask, What does your spouse do or fail to do that hurts you most deeply? 2) Ask, What have you most requested of your spouse? 3Ask in what way do you most regularly express love to your spouse.
Why not see what your love language is here.

One last thought:  There are flaws with this book.  For example, the idea is given that you give to your spouse that they might give to you.  Also, there could be the risk that you are simply seeking to impress your spouse by playing to their demands.  Nevertheless, if these languages are used as tools that can be used to express genuine love to your spouse there is much value in them.
  

Monday, 2 July 2012

Gifts

When Caroline did the love language survey it turned out that gifts was here secondary language.  This is helpful for me to know as I didn't score on gifts.  For me gifts are materialistic 'i.e. is this useful?'  For Caroline gifts are symbolic and emotional.  When we were first married I couldn't see the value of flowers, they are expensive and they fade so quickly.  I am trying to be better with gifts, although I have bored Caroline by the fact that so many of my gifts are chocolate.  Chapman says that gifts is one of the easiest love languages to learn.  The thing I found most revealing in this chapter was the emphasis of our presence as a gift.

Quotes from the chapter:
'If you are to become an effective gift giver, you may have to change your attitude about money ... to invest in loving your spouse is to invest in blue-chip stocks.'
'Being there when your spouse needs you speaks loudly to one whose primary love language is receiving gifts.'


Acts of service

'Acts of service' is Caroline's primary love language so I thought that I had better pay attention as I read this chapter of Chapman's book.  Chapman emphasises the difference between requests and demands.  'Requests give direction to love, but demands stop the flow of love.'  It is very important that neither spouse feels taken for granted or pushed about.  He also suggests finding out those things that you could do for your spouse that would show them that you love them. 

Quotes
... what we do before marriage is no indication of what we will do after marriage.  Before marriage we are carried along by the force of the in-love obsession.  After marriage, we revert to being the people we were before we "fell in love."
'My spouse's criticisms about my behaviour provide me with the clearest clue to he primary love language. People trend to criticise their spouse most loudly in the area where they themselves have the deepest emotional need.  Their criticism is an ineffective way of pleading for love.'

Friday, 15 June 2012

Can I have some of your time?

The second love language, that Gary Chapman mentions, is quality time.  I don't think that this is either Caroline or my primary love language but it is important to both of us.  Recently we resumed the practise of having a date night.  We had a great conversation and were both on a high from it the next day.

Quality time means giving the person your undivided attention.  Chapman mentions two dialects of this language: quality conversation and quality activities.  I think that I am more concerned about quality conversations and Caroline is more concerned quality activities.

Quality Conversations.  There is a difference between the quality conversation and the love language of words.  'Words of affirmation focus on what we are saying, whereas quality conversation focuses on what we are hearing.'  'If I am sharing my love for you by means of quality time and we are going to spend time in conversation, it means I will focus on drawing you out, listening sympathetically to what you have to say. I will ask questions, not in a badgering manner but with genuine desire to understand your thoughts, feelings, and hopes.'

'Quality conversation requires not only sympathetic listening but also self-revelation.'  Chapman highlights that some people are like the Dead Sea (which receives water but goes nowhere) and others are like babbling brooks.  He says that Dead Seas often marry Babbling Brooks.  You see, it is great when they are going out and infatuated with each other.  The Babbling Brook just pours it all out and the Dead Sea sits their and listens.  But later on the Dead Sea gets a little weary of listening to the Babbling Brook and the Babbling Brook feels a lack of intimacy because the Dead Sea never shares their heart.  The good news is that Dead Seas can learn to talk and Babbling Brooks can learn to listen.

Quality activities.  A person whose love languages involve quality time is into creating memories.  Caroline doesn't just want us to go out she wants us to do something special.  It is important that the person who is seeking to give such love does so with a positive attitude.  One helpful suggestion is to ask your spouse for five activities that he/she would enjoy doing with you.

Monday, 4 June 2012

Only words?

The first love language that Gary Chapman mentions is 'words of affirmation'.  I think that this is my primary love language.  When I was leaving Richhill a friend bought me a book.  He did not inscribe anything on it, in case I already had that book.  I was gutted.  What he might have written in the book would have been more value to me than the book itself.  I have also kept some letters where people have said very kind things to me (I admit that there may be some vanity in this).  Chapman mentions affirming words, encouraging words, kind words and humble words.  

Monday, 28 May 2012

I used to love her ...

I was talking to a young student a few months ago about his relationship.  He had recently started dating and the couple wanted me to set them up with Christians who could give them advice and hold them accountable. 
  
We went for a walk and I started asking questions.  I mentioned how the 'in-love' feelings are transitory.  This made sense to him.  He spoke of his previous relationship, where the feelings had worn off and left him with the conclusion that she was not 'the one'. 
  
Gary Chapman explains that most people enter marriage by way of the in-love experience believe these feelings are the necessary foundation for good marriage.  'Unfortunatley, the eternality of the in-love experience is fiction, not fact.'  The average lifespan for such feelings is two years.
  
When we are experiencing the 'in-love' euphoria we think that our beloved is perfect.  Others see her faults but we won't listen.  Although we are told marriage is tough we believe that our marriage will be different.  The passion seems to have faded from other people's marriages but this will not happen to us.  In Christian circles, those in the euphoric state sometimes spend their time telling you of the amazing way God brought them together.
   
However, when we come out of the euphoric state we begin to see our beloved warts and all.  'Those little traits that we overlooked when we were in love now become huge mountains.'  Now the formally happy couple realise that marriage is both for better and for worse.  'They fall out of love, and at that point either they withdraw, separate, divorce, or they begin the hard work of learning to love each other without the euphoric in-love obsession.'
      
But this is not all bad news.  In fact the in-love experience can be replaced with something better, "real love".  This "real love" involves effort and discipline.  It is more secure because it is not dependant on the passing euphoria and it is more noble because it is not dependant on obsession.  Here we choose to love our spouse and have the joy of knowing that they choose to love us too.
    
When couples used to tell me that they love each other in a different way than they did on their wedding day I assumed that they no longer really loved each other.  That is not necessarily the case.  Real love is more satisfying and well worth the effort.  It is also not devoid of feelings but these feelings are no longer obsessional and transient. 
   
What about that young student I met?  He should enjoy the 'in-love' phase but be realistic about it.  He should make his decisions about marriage on more secure grounds than his feelings.  He should seek to make rational choices concerning her.  Then if they do marry they should be prepared for the joyous sacrifice of choosing to love one another.

Monday, 21 May 2012

Reverse engineering: Your life and marriage

The final chapter of the Driscolls' book on marriage is entitled Reverse Engineering.  The idea of reverse engineering is 'to anticipate life forward and live it backward.'

Some of their practical tips involves going to bed together, having a weekly date night, getting away for a romantic night four times a year and praying together each day.

'The most important day of your marriage is the last day ... Will the last day of your marriage come prematurely through divorce?  Will the last day of your marriage be filled with regrets as you stand over the coffin of your spouse?  Or by God's grace will the last day be a day to rejoice in a life lived together and remember the gift your spouse was to you while on earth?'

Monday, 14 May 2012

Contraversial chapter 10

Chapter 10 of the Driscolls' book Real Marriage is the one that has attracted all the headlines.  It is entitled Can we ____?  This is to do with what they believe to be permissible in the area of sex.

They begin with a good point: 'if people don't get answers from pastors and parents, they will find them in dark, depraved places.'  Sometimes parents resist the church teaching their children about sex.  However, unless they are doing a particularly good job of instructing them at home they risk their child growing into a vulnerable and gullible adult.  Also, if the church does not teach young people about sex, we are leaving the task to some parents who may not be Christians and to the secular educational system.

The way the Driscolls deal with questions about what is permissible is to ask: is it lawful? is it helpful? and, is it enslaving?  You might want to borrow my book to see what they think is permissible.  It should be remembered that they see sex as being for marriage.  Realistically, I did not think that this chapter is overly controversial. 

An interesting comment about the Puritans.  They enacted the first laws anywhere in the world against wife beating (between 1640 and 1680).

Monday, 7 May 2012

Selfish Lovers and Servant Lovers

Chapter nine of the Driscolls' book Real Marriage is about the need for humility and generosity.  It is part of the section on sex.  Caroline and I have found that marriage has exposed our selfishness. 

Some quotes from the book:
'The pattern of selfishness is so deeply woven into the fabric of our lives that it takes years of marriage to even begin to deal with the problem and move from "me" to "we" ... It takes between nine and fifteen years for a couple to become not entirely unselfish, but rather less selfish, and begin to shift from "me" to "we".'
'Your spouse is the most sanctifying, and often most frustrating, relationship you will have.  God will use our spouses to expose our selfishness and make us to be increasingly more humble servants like Jesus Christ.'
'For a wife, sex comes out of a healthy relationship, whereas, for a husband it leads to one.'

The Driscolls talk about the 'little foxes' (Songs 2:15) that disturb the love in marriage.  Things like time-keeping, impatience, strong language, name-calling etc.  Couples need to work together to help each other in these areas.  

They mention the need to be sexually available to your spouse (1 Cor. 7:3-5), encouraging free and frequent sex.  They point out that Martin Luther counselled couples to have sex twice a week (hooray for Luther).  They point out that decreased sexual activity and interest begins in  the first two years of marriage.  A frigthening statistic is that around 15% of married Americans have not had sex with their spouse in the last six months to one year.  In a previous era in Boston a man was excommunicated because he refused to have sex with his wife for two years (the Puritans are often misunderstood.

Monday, 30 April 2012

See no evil

The eighth chapter of Real Marriage deals with the issue of pornography.  I am not restricting the term porn to material that would be officially categorised as pornographic but I am also including lustfully looking at half-dressed women in advertisements, watching the sex scenes in mainstream films etc..  Therefore, I imagine that almost every Christian man has some history with this. 

The Driscolls writes,
This chapter may have been as brutal for you to read as it has been brutal for us to write.  We have sought to sand the varnish off porn and sinful lust so as to see it for what it truly is - a horrific evil with no redeeming value.  As horrific as these evils are, people enslaved by them are not beyond the redeeming grace of God made available through Jesus Christ.  In closing, we offer some practical advice for those to be free of porn and sinful lust ...
You must be honest with yourself ...
You must be honest with God ...
You must be honest with your spouse ... How much detail you share is important.  If you share too much, he or she could be haunted for life.  If you share too little, your spouse will not really know the truth and may allow his or her imagination to male things worse than they really are ...
You must put your sexual sin to death by the grace of God ...
You must submit to God the Holy Spirit ...
You must practise sexual contentment ...
You must think in terms of legacy ... 

Monday, 23 April 2012

Disgrace and Grace

Like the first chapter of Real Marriage, chapter 7 is autobiographical.  It is entitled 'Disgrace and grace' and deals with the sexual sin committed by Grace and the abuse towards her by a previous boyfriend.  She is wonderfully honest.  Her story reminded me of the need for the church to be a safe place for those carrying pain.  She includes a number of interesting quotes:
'We must name the troubling past truthfully - we must come to clarity about what happened, how we reacted, and how we are reacting to it now - to be freed from its destructive hold on our lives.  Granted, truth naming will not by itself heal memories or wrong suffered; but without truthful naming, all measures we might undertake to heal such memories will remain incomplete' (Miroslav Volf).
'God receives none but those who are forsaken, restores health to none but those who are sick, gives sight to none but the blind, and life to none but the dead ... He has mercy on none but the wretched and gives grace to none but those who are in disgrace (Martin Luther).
'The only way to move from denial, isolation, and self-protection is to look honestly at the assault that has been done to you.  Healing begins when the secret is disclosed and the shackles of silence are broken' (Justin and Lindsey Holcombs).

Thursday, 19 April 2012

Sex: God, Gross or Gift?

Almost half of the Driscolls' book on marriage focuses on the issue of sex.  I actually think that this is a good thing.  It is clear that the Bible is not reticent about this subject but few Christian leaders teach openly and frequently on it.  Chapter 6 is entitled 'Sex: God, gross, or gift?'

Of course those who have talked openly with people about this area of their lives will know that along with the intimacy and vulnerability of sex comes confusion and pain.  The Driscolls ask, 'How did sex, which is a gift from God to married couples, turn into such a curse for so many of us?'  They answer this question with mention to the Fall (Genesis 3).  'This fall of humanity into sin infected, polluted, and corrupted literally every aspect of life on the earth.  This includes sex ... The result is that people tend to think that sex is god or gross to various degrees, rather than a gift.'

Sex as god.  This attitude can be seen in the ancient cultures that surrounded the Hebrews but is also observable in our own society. 
Sex as gross.  This attitude can be attributed to the influence of Plato on the thinking of the church.
Sex as gift.  This idea was actually promoted by the Puritans who appealed to the teaching of the Bible.

Under the heading of sex as gift the Driscolls say: sex is for pleasure, sex is for creating children, sex is for oneness, sex is for knowledge, sex is for protection and sex is for comfort.

Other interesting quotes:
'... your standard of beauty is your spouse ... Unlike other standards of beauty, a spouse changes over time.  This means that if your spouse is tall, you are into tall.  If your spouse is skinny, you are into skinny.  If your spouse is twenty, you are into twenty.  When your spouse is sixty, you are no longer into twenty, but rather into sixty.  And if your spouse used to be skinny, you were into skinny, but now you are into formerly skinny.  We are to pour all our passion and pursuit of sexual pleasure into our spouses alone, without comparing them to anyone else in a lustful way.'
'Your biggest sex organ is your brain.  Thinking rightly about sex is essential to your enjoyment of sex.'

Wednesday, 11 April 2012

Taking out the trash

Back to Mark and Grace Driscoll's book on marriage.  Chapter 5 is entitled 'Taking out the trash'.  But it is not about who puts the bins out.  It deals with sin. 
'If you are married, you will have conflict.  You cannot avoid it because marriage is an unconditional commitment to an imperfect person.'
The Driscolls speak of the 'four horsemen' who are certain to multiply relational pain and result in marital death.  They are, criticism, contempt, defensiveness and stonewalling.  They suggest that husbands do 85% of stonewalling.

They quote Gary Thomas who declares that, 'Couples don't fall out of love so much as they fall out of repentance.' 

Although I used to be a Methodist minister, and knew that John Wesley's marriage was a disaster, I did not know the details of how he had met Molly Vazeille.  Wesley was forty-eight when he was crossing London Bridge, slipped and broke his ankle.  He was taken to Molly's home.  She was a forty-one-year-old widow.  Without even a mention in Wesley's journal, the two were married eight days later.  Some biographers have referred to their marriage as 'the thirty years war.'  Wesley didn't see how his marriage should affect his ministry, writing, 'I cannot understand how a Methodist preacher can answer it to God ... to preach one sermon, or travel one day less, in a married than in a single state.'  Molly tried to travel with him for the first four years but experienced constant illness and feared the angry mobs.  She tried to get him to reduce his itinerant ministry. 
The two became bitter enemies.  She sent damaging letters to his critics and tried to destroy his ministry.  In one of his letters to her he admits to shaking her and that it 'might have made you black and blue.'  Their final years were spent apart.  Molly was dead and buried a few days before her husband was even notified.  Driscoll comments, 'The painful story of the Wesleys reminds us that there is no loving marriages apart from repentance and forgiveness.  Marriage either gets bitter or better.' 

The Driscolls suggest that the key to a good fight, that ends in reconciliation, rather than a bad fight, that ends in bitterness, is to learn to fight as friends and not enemies.  They suggest the following rules of engagement:

1. You have to decide if your spouse has committed a sin (If they have you can either overlook it and pray for them or wait for an appropriate time to address them about it).
2.  You have to decide how to deal with the conflict ('Knowing how you and your spouse respond to conflict [the tendency to fight, flight or fright] will help you know how to lovingly engage each other when frustrated).
3.  Do not flight when either of you has substances in you e.g. are drunk.
4.  Before you fight, stop and pray.
5. 'Do not use fighting with your spouse as your release valve or lightening rod.'
6.  On occasion get help from people both spouses respect.


Some other quotes:
In seasons of bitterness, we have a proclivity to blame others, most likely our spouses, for our bittrerness, as if they placed it in us through their transgression.  The truth is people, even the worst of them, do not embitter us.  Rather, they provide an opportunity, or temptation, to choose bitterness, for which we remain morally responsible.
Bitter people have a filter through which everything (past, present, and future) is viewed negatively.

Monday, 2 April 2012

The Respectful Wife

Again a warning.  My egalitarian friends (men and women are equal and have the same roles) will not enjoy Grace Driscoll's complimentarian (men and women are equal but play different roles) perspective.  Chapter 4 of the Driscoll's book on marriage is written by Grace and is titled 'The Respectful Wife.'

I suppose you could summarise much of her teaching by saying that she encourages a positive (making the effort to notice the good things about your husband) rather than a negative (always focusing on his failings) approach.  That being said she believes that a wife should be willing to confront her husband and encourage him to change.  Not only does she criticise the contentious wife, she also highlights the problems of the silent compliant wife.  She says that wives need to work on disagreeing respectfully, counselling respectfully and submitting respectfully.

Some quotes:
'A wife is the most powerful person in her husband's life, with a great opportunity to encourage her husband towards godliness through her words, actions, and body language.'
'We believe ... the husband gets to decide when he feels disrespected ... And the wife gets to decide when she feels unloved ...'
'A wife flourishes with a loving husband, and a husband becomes courageous with a respectful wife.'
'... our goal cannot be to fix our husbands or even to save our marriages, but rather to glorifying God by submitting to our husbands, trusting that His commands are those of a loving Father who not only wants our lives to work but to be ones of worship.'




Thursday, 29 March 2012

Men and Marriage

It's time for chapter 3 of Mark Driscoll's book on marriage.  This chapter is entitled, 'Men and Marriage.'  I am aware that some of my friends will not like his complimentarian views.  He emphasises the role of the husband as head and provider. 

He criticises those he calls Tough Chauvinists ('No sissy-stuff Sam', 'Success-and-status Stewart', 'Give 'em Hell Hank', and 'I'm the boss Bob') and those he calls Tender Cowards ('Little-boy Larry', 'Sturdy-Oak Owen', 'Hyper-sensitive Henry', and 'Good-time Gary').  I didn't find all his caricatures recognisable in the people I know but then he is writing of people he observes in an American culture. 

His emphasis is on men stepping up and taking responsibility, and who could disagree with with his statement that the 'key to understanding masculinity is Jesus Christ.'  He suggests that we live in a day of delayed adolescence with many 'boys who can shave' type men.

He gives the practical advice of getting involved in a good church (he cites a report that claims that couples who attend church together report greater marital happiness, marital support, and romance in their marriages); agreeing on what the Bible says (I am thankful that Caroline tends not only agree with what I already believe but shares the same instincts as we explore new areas of understanding); and worshipping together in the home. 

Some quotes:
'Too many men are more like conquerors than explorers.  They get married - which is akin to landing on the beach of an unexplored land - yet fail to explore the landscape and all its wonders.  Our wives do not want to be conquered; they want to be explored emotionally.'
'A single woman should only marry a man she respects and trusts enough to follow.'
'You may read this chapter and think you are loving and leading well.  But it is your wife who gets to make the call on your performance.'

Monday, 19 March 2012

Friends with benefits

It's time for my next post on Mark Driscoll's book on marriage.

Driscoll opens the second chapter with a few pages on Martin Luther's marriage.  This gripped me as I am fascinated by Luther.  The second chapter is entitled 'Friends with benefits.'

Mark seems to like telling us how much he reads. He says that he and his wife read all, or part, of 187 books on marriage in preparation to write their own.  He says that none of these books had a chapter, or significant part of a chapter, on friendship.  However, Tim Keller's book on marriage, which I am also enjoying, has a lot to say about friendship (and it was released the year before Driscoll's).  Driscoll's statement had the feel of those young pastors who think that no one has managed to do anything properly until they arrived on the scene.

This second chapter is not as gripping as the first.  It centred on the acronym F.R.I.E.N.D.S. (Fruitful, Reciprocal, Intimate, Enjoyable, Needed, Devoted, Needed and Sanctifying).  

Just a couple of quotes:
'No wife likes feeling like a problem to be fixed rather than a person who wants to be intimate.'
'As C. S. Lewis says, "Eros will have naked bodies; Friendship naked personalities."' 
'A spouse who only showers you with praise, never disagrees with you, and avoids conflict at all costs, is an enabling rather than a sanctifying friend.'

Monday, 12 March 2012

We need to talk about sex!

I am doing marriage preparation with Elton and Louise.  Now, Louise is a big Mark Driscoll fan.  So I decided that we would work through his new book on marriage.  I am going to post my thoughts on this book over the next few weeks.

Before I get into the book, I need to say that I believe that as a church we need to talk about sex.  As adults we need to talk about sex, but we also need to teach our young people about this subject.  We want them to have a biblical perspective on this.  If we don't teach them as a church where will our young people learn?  Do we really think that their schools will base their guidance simply on Scripture?  What if their parents don't believe the Bible's teaching and so give them mixed messages?  What if their parents are simply too to embarrassed to talk openly?

Anyway, the book.  I will deal with a chapter a week.

The first chapter tells Mark and Grace's story.  Those from a more egalitarian background will baulk at his belief that the husband should bear the entire financial responsibility for the family.  Those who are cautious about talk of prophetic insights will be uncomfortable with his description of a prophetic dream (in which God revealed to him that his wife had cheated on him before they were married).

They are very open about their sexual failures.  They write this book together and this opening chapter must have been particularly difficult for Grace to pen.  However, I found their openness refreshing and it gave me the impression that these are people that you could talk to about failures, frustrations and fears concerning marriage.  I look forward to my weekly chapter from this book.

Wednesday, 29 February 2012

Trophy wives and being happy as a husband

'You complete me' Jerry Maguire (Hollywood nonesense).

I struggle with self-doubt.  When I was in primary school I came last in sports races.  In secondary school I was in the lower stream.  I repeated to get into college.  In wanted to get a 2:1 to prove myself but missed it.

Moving to Limerick (Ireland's rugby capital) has focused my thoughts on sports.  For a couple of years I was moderately good at rugby.  I played for the first XV in the school I went to and the school I repeated in.  However, neither school was a notable rugby school and I was probably the weakest player on the first of these two teams.  I also could only play one position, discovered I could play this position by accident, and was blessed by the fact that there was a shortage of people in that position (there was one guy in my year who was probably better than me in my position but he had given up because of a bad back).

So as I watched Munster and Ireland play I started obsessing about my rugby.  'Was I really any good?'  'What did my team mates think of me as a player?'  'What about that terrible knock on against Blackrock?' etc.  It actually burdened me.

One of the solutions to such stupid thinking (such sinfully self-absorbed thinking) was to start concentrating on the sovereignty of God.  'God made me the way I am;' 'God has watched over all my circumstances' etc.  In reality rugby is such a small deal it should not matter.  I am a work in progress in all areas of my life.

Anyway, what has this to do with marriage? 
Well, one way that people deal with their insecurities is through their marriage.  At a crass level there are those who go for a 'trophy wife.'  They demand that their wife looks a certain way so that it might reflect well on them.  There is also the fact that we demand affirmation from our spouse.  We demand that their undying admiration takes away the fears and pain of feeling insecure.  Consevative Christian men like me complain that our wives don't obey the biblical mandate to 'respect' us.  We demand that they erase our self-doubt.  We use them to boost our self-esteem.  It is all very selfish!

One evening in Richhill, Caroline and I went to a marriage evening in the Presbyterian church.  The speaker was Paul Tripp.  I actually hoped that what he would do is teach wives how to respect their husbands more.  (I know, how silly was I?  I clearly felt that if Caroline met my perceived needs then my life would be more fulfilled).  What Paul Tripp actually did was to emphasise the gospel and make personal repentance the centre of marriage.  (Although it wasn't spelling out to Caroline what I wanted her to do for me, I was glad that she took the message on board.  Again, what a fool I was.  I didn't see the message as being primarily for me.) 

Tim Keller writes, 'Until God has the proper place in my life, I will always be complaining that my spouse is not loving me well enough, not respecting me enough, not supporting me enough.'  He also says, 'The only way to avoid sacrificing your partner's joy and freedom on the alter of your need is to turn to the ultimate lover of your soul.'

Finally, I haven't mentioned the correct motivation for wanting to be a good spouse.  Before the apostle Paul spells out the roles for a husband and wife he writes, 'submit to one another out of reverence for Christ' (Ephesians 5:21).  Again Keller writes, 'Amazed joy at the sacrifice and love of Christ is the motivation for all New Testament calls to defer, love, and serve.'  Romans 12 links worship to how we live our lives.  Being a good husband/wife can be a means of seeking to praise God.  That is why one book on marriage has the sub-title, Sex in the Service of God.'