Andrew points out that this argument against the existence of God only became popular, in western culture, in the last two-hundred-and-fifty years. This was when western people began to assume that, if God exists, they should be able to understand his mind.
So, their argument went: (1) An all-powerful, all-loving, all-knowing God would not permit suffering without good reason, (2) I cannot think of any good reasons why he would allow certain tragedies, (3) therefore, there isn't one, (4) suffering exists, (5) so an all-powerful, all-loving, all-knowing God does not exist.
The problem obviously centres on point 3.
Most cultures look at this issue differently. They do not assume that they have full knowledge of the mind of God/gods. So they would reason: (1) An all-powerful, all-loving, all-knowing God would not permit suffering without good reason, (2) I cannot think of any good reasons why he would allow certain tragedies, (3) my knowledge, however, is hugely limited, (4) suffering exists, (5) this is a mystery.
No comments:
Post a Comment